| 第 47 卷第 2 期 |  | Vol. 47 No. 2 | | 2017 年 4 月 | Apr 2017 |
|
所屬欄目：分析與測試
燒結煙氣中二氧化硫監測方法探討 |
| 周 覓1，楊 夕2，張明慧1
（1．杭州天量檢測科技有限公司，浙江 杭州 311202；2. 三捷環(huán)境工程咨詢(xún)（杭州）有限公司，浙江 杭州 310012） |
| 摘 要：針對燒結煙氣高含濕度大、CO含量高的特點(diǎn)，考察了水分和CO對碘量法、定電位電解法、非分散紅外法、傅立葉紅外法和非分散紫外法的影響，對比了以上5種方法對燒結煙氣的檢測結果。實(shí)驗結果表明定電位電解法不適用于測定燒結煙氣，碘量法、非分散紅外法和非分散紫外法適用于測定SO2濃度高于100 mg／m3的燒結煙氣，對于SO2濃度較低的燒結煙氣，傅立葉紅外法具有更好的準確性。 |
| 關(guān)鍵詞：燒結煙氣；水分；CO；SO2 |
| 中圖分類(lèi)號：X831 文獻標識碼：A 文章編號：1009-9212（2017）02-0068-05 |
|
| Comparison of Methods for the Determination of Sulfur Dioxide Emissions in Sintering Flue Gas |
| ZHOU Mi1, YANG Xi2, ZHANG Ming-hui1
(1. Hangzhou Tianliang Detection Technology Co.,Ltd., Hangzhou 311202, China; 2. Trinity Consultants China Office, Hangzhou 310012, China) |
| Abstract：The effects of moisture and CO on iodometric method, fixed-potential electrolysis method, non-dispersive infrared method, Fourier transform infrared method and non-dispersive ultraviolet method were investigated for sintering flue gas with high content of moisture and high CO. Comparison was performed among the testing results of the above-mentioned five methods. The experimental results showed that the fixed-potential electrolysis method was not suitable for the determination of SO2 concentration in sintering flue gas. The iodometric method, non-dispersive infrared method and non-dispersive ultraviolet method were suitable for the determination of SO2 in sintering flue gas with a concentration of SO2 emission higher than 100 mg/m3. While the Fourier infrared method has better accuracy for sintering flue gas with lower SO2 content. |
| Key words：sintering flue gas; moisture; CO; SO2 |
|
作者簡(jiǎn)介：周 覓（1983-），女，四川宜賓人，工程師，研究方向：環(huán)境監測技術(shù)（E-mail： mizhou620@aliyun.com）
|
收稿日期：2016-04-03
|
|